Accurate assessment of a Dutch practical robustness evaluation protocol in clinical PT with pencil beam scanning for neurological tumors

Jesús Rojo-Santiago*, Steven J.M. Habraken, Danny Lathouwers, Alejandra Méndez Romero, Zoltán Perkó, Mischa S. Hoogeman

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

4 Downloads (Pure)


Background and purpose: Scenario-based robust optimization and evaluation are commonly used in proton therapy (PT) with pencil beam scanning (PBS) to ensure adequate dose to the clinical target volume (CTV). However, a statistically accurate assessment of the clinical application of this approach is lacking. In this study, we assess target dose in a clinical cohort of neuro-oncological patients, planned according to the DUPROTON robustness evaluation consensus, using polynomial chaos expansion (PCE). Materials and methods: A cohort of the first 27 neuro-oncological patients treated at HollandPTC was used, including realistic error distributions derived from geometrical and stopping-power prediction (SPP) errors. After validating the model, PCE-based robustness evaluations were performed by simulating 100.000 complete fractionated treatments per patient to obtain accurate statistics on clinically relevant dosimetric parameters and population-dose histograms. Results: Treatment plans that were robust according to clinical protocol and treatment plansin which robustness was sacrificed are easily identified. For robust treatment plans on average, a CTV dose of 3 percentage points (p.p.) more than prescribed was realized (range +2.7 p.p. to +3.5 p.p.) for 98% of the sampled fractionated treatments. For the entire patient cohort on average, a CTV dose of 0.1 p.p. less than prescribed was achieved (range −2.4 p.p. to +0.5 p.p.). For the 6 treatment plans in which robustness was clinically sacrificed, normalized CTV doses of 0.98, 0.94(7)1, 0.94, 0.91, 0.90 and 0.89 were realized. The first of these was clinically borderline non-robust. Conclusion: The clinical robustness evaluation protocol is safe in terms of CTV dose as all plans that fulfilled the clinical robustness criteria were also robust in the PCE evaluation. Moreover, for plans that were non-robust in the PCE-based evaluation, CTV dose was also lower than prescribed in the clinical evaluation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)121-127
Number of pages7
JournalRadiotherapy and Oncology
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2021

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
The authors would like to especially thank Albert Licup for contributing to the patient setup data analysis and Yibing Wang for support with RayStation scripting, as well as the KWF Dutch cancer society (Project Number 11711) for supporting financially this project. Zolt?n Perk? would like to thank the support of the NWO VENI grant ALLEGRO (016.Veni.198.055) during the time of this study. The data used in this study originates from the research database of HollandPTC. This database consists of data from all consenting patients treated in HollandPTC. The local Institutional Review Board of LUMC waived the need to assess the protocol of the research database.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors


Dive into the research topics of 'Accurate assessment of a Dutch practical robustness evaluation protocol in clinical PT with pencil beam scanning for neurological tumors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this